The SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard 2.0, published in summer 2026, changes the way corporate climate targets are assessed. In short, the updated standard shifts the focus from setting targets to delivering them. Companies are expected to demonstrate more concrete emissions reductions, credible transition plans, and regular progress monitoring.
What has changed, who will be affected, and what should companies do next?
What Is the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard 2.0?
The Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) is the world’s leading framework for science-based climate targets. The purpose of the updated standard is to make corporate climate action more practical and implementation-focused, moving beyond target-setting toward measurable action and results.
SBTi describes the new standard as a shift from “ambition to real-world implementation.”
What Are the Most Important Changes in the SBTi Corporate Net-Zero Standard 2.0?
The updated standard places greater emphasis on credible implementation. Companies are expected to demonstrate concrete emissions reductions, transparent progress tracking, and a clear pathway to net zero.
1. Different Requirements for Different Types of Companies
- Different Requirements for Different Types of Companies: The new standard better recognises differences between companies of various sizes and operating environments. In particular, it introduces greater flexibility for SMEs and companies operating in lower-income countries when setting targets and reporting progress.
- Actionable Targets Linked to Business Reality: Companies are expected to set multiple near-term emissions reduction targets that reflect their sector, value chain, geographic context, and business model. At the same time, the connection between target-setting and transition planning is strengthened. Targets should be supported by a credible implementation plan.
- Greater Transparency in Target Delivery: Setting a target alone is no longer sufficient. Companies are expected to use all available levers to reduce emissions, identify barriers to implementation, and openly report on both progress and challenges.
- Emissions Reductions Take Priority: The standard prioritises real emissions reductions within a company’s own operations and value chain. Market-based instruments, such as renewable energy certificates and other sustainability mechanisms, may support climate action, but they cannot replace actual emissions reductions.
- Continuous Monitoring and Improvement: Companies are expected to assess progress annually, identify any gaps between performance and targets, and update their approach when necessary. Achieving net zero is viewed as a continuous improvement process rather than a one-time project.
- Carbon Credits as a Complementary Tool: SBTi continues to allow the use of high-quality carbon credits and other climate finance mechanisms. However, their role is complementary. They cannot substitute for a company’s own emissions reduction efforts and should instead contribute to broader climate impact.
Do Existing SBTi Targets Need to Be Updated?
Not necessarily. Existing targets do not automatically become obsolete, but companies should evaluate whether their current commitments meet the expectations of the updated standard.
Particular attention should be paid to transition planning and progress monitoring, as both play a more prominent role in the new framework. Companies considering target updates should note that transitions to the new standard will be managed under the updated requirements from 2027 onwards.
Further guidance is available in the SBTi transition guide.
Does the New Standard Require a Climate Roadmap or Transition Plan?
Increasingly, yes.
While climate roadmaps and transition plans are not new concepts, the updated standard places much greater emphasis on the connection between targets and practical actions. Companies should be able to demonstrate where emissions reductions will come from and over what timeframe they are expected to occur.
Three Questions Every Leadership Team Should Ask Right Now
- Is our current climate target still aligned with stakeholder and market expectations?
- Can we demonstrate a credible roadmap for achieving our targets?
- Are we actively using climate action to build competitive advantage?
How Can SBTi Targets Create Business Value?
In practice, the greatest business benefits rarely come from reporting itself, even though reporting may be a minimum requirement for many stakeholders.
Rather than focusing solely on backward-looking reporting, forward-looking climate management can help companies identify:
- Cost-saving opportunities
- Supply chain risks
- Emerging customer requirements
- New business opportunities
For companies that successfully integrate climate action into their strategy, SBTi targets can become a powerful tool for strengthening competitiveness rather than simply a compliance exercise.
What Should Companies Do Next?
Recommended Actions
- Assess whether your current climate targets remain fit for purpose.
- Review whether your organisation has a credible transition plan.
- Ensure that emissions monitoring supports effective target management.
- Focus on identifying business value beyond compliance and reporting.
- Prepare for increased scrutiny from key stakeholders such as investors, lenders, customers, and business partners, who are increasingly seeking evidence of implementation rather than ambition alone.
Need Support?
Do you need help updating your SBTi targets, climate roadmap, or transition plan? Book a free 30-minute discussion with our experts.
Learn more about our SBTi services.
Explore our SBTi and climate roadmap client success stories.
Source
Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)
Corporate Net-Zero Standard Version 2.0
